• Blog
  • My Account
  • Logout
Annuvia

Call Today! 866-364-7940

Monday - Friday 7 AM – 7 PM Central Time

  • AHA Classes
    • CPR AED Training
    • First Aid Training
    • BLS for Healthcare Provider
    • Other Courses
  • AED Medical Direction
    • Ongoing AED Oversight
    • AED Unit Registration
    • AED Use Reporting
    • Reviews
  • Classes By Location
    • Atlanta, GA
    • Chicago, IL
    • Denver, CO
    • Los Angeles, CA
    • New York, NY
    • San Francisco, CA
    • Seattle, WA
    • More Locations
  • Blog
  • Oxygen

California Supreme Court Finding Could Catalyze AED Adoption

-By Micah Bongberg Google+ | @annuvia

Verdugo v Target Corporation

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – Mary Ann Verdugo suffered sudden cardiac arrest while shopping at a Target store in Southern CA and died before paramedics arrived. Her relatives filed a wrongful death action against Target alleging her death was due to negligence on the part of Target for not having an AED available in the store.

The case was filed in the California Superior Court but transferred to the Federal District Court based on diversity of citizenship (Target is a Minnesota corporation). The Federal District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. That court found as a matter of law that Target’s common law duty to render reasonable first aid to its business invitees was not breached by its failure to have an AED available at its store.

Plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Federal Court of Appeals. After a thorough review, the court concluded that there is no controlling precedent in California law resolving the question of reasonable duty raised by this complaint. Because of the broad implications of the question raised and lack of California precedent, the federal court panel certified a question of California law to the California Supreme Court and agreed to follow the answer provided by that court.

The question is:
“In what circumstances, if ever, does the common law duty of a commercial property owner to provide emergency first aid to invitees require the availability of an Automatic External Defibrillator (“AED”) for cases of sudden cardiac arrest?”

The 3 judge Appellate Court panel is divided on the issue presented in this case. One justice has expressed the view that there is no common law duty to provide an AED, one has stated a duty does exist and the third has not commented.

The California Supreme Court is not required accept the case and respond to the question presented to it by the Federal Court of Appeals. If it does not, the Federal court should ultimately deal with the question and rule accordingly.

If the California Supreme Court finds that Target’s reasonable duty to provide first aid includes having an AED available, the case will be returned to the Federal District Court, the complaint will stand, Target will have the opportunity to respond and the case will proceed from there.

Without question, a ruling favorable to the Verdugo plaintiffs would be a significant victory for them and could strongly influence decisions of California businesses regarding placement of AEDs and training its employees in CPR/AED. It would bring the issue of the required “standard of care” to the fore and, most probably, result in some sort of legislative response.

    Drop Us a Note!

    • Captcha code: captcha

    Blog Categories

    • Annuvia News
    • Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs)
    • Corporate Health and Wellness Programs
    • CPR and First Aid Training
    • Health and Wellness
    • HeartSine
    • Technology
    • Uncategorized
    • Workplace Safety Training

    RSS Blog RSS

    • Update to Verdugo Case
    • CPR RsQ Assist: Staying Ahead of Sudden Cardiac Arrest
    • The CPR Problem
    • Police Add AEDs to their Tool Belt
    • New Defibrillator on the Market

    RSS Comments RSS

    • Comment on What does the law say about administering CPR? by Mbongberg
    • Comment on What does the law say about administering CPR? by Brian Graddon
    • Comment on CALIFORNIA – SUPREME COURT RULING DEFINES GOOD SAMARITAN LAW PROTECTIONS by Gary F. Logan
    • Comment on CPR is not the Silver Bullet by Lakewood District Buys 10 AEDs | Honolulu CPR Training.com
    • Comment on Tips for Creating a Company First Aid & CPR Program That Really Works by Solomon Hosford

    Tag Cloud

    Add new tag AED Medical Direction AED Oversight aeds AED training AED Units automated external defibrillators CPR AED Classes CPR training First Aid training health and wellness programs Workplace Safety Training

    Blog Archives

    • November 2014 (1)
    • July 2014 (1)
    • June 2014 (10)
    • May 2014 (7)
    • April 2014 (1)
    • March 2014 (7)
    • December 2012 (1)
    • June 2012 (1)
    • December 2011 (1)
    • October 2011 (1)
    • September 2011 (1)
    • July 2011 (2)
    • March 2011 (4)
    • October 2010 (3)
    • August 2010 (1)
    • July 2010 (1)
    • June 2010 (1)
    • March 2010 (1)
    • February 2010 (1)
    • January 2010 (1)
    • December 2009 (3)
    • November 2009 (1)
    • October 2009 (3)
    • September 2009 (3)
    • May 2009 (2)

    About Us

    • Accessibility Statement
    • About Us
    • Management
    • Mission
    • Reviews
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Code of Conduct
    • Terms of Use
    • Supplier Code of Conduct

    Resources

    • Resources
    • AED Laws
    • Annuvia’s Articles
    • CPR & AED Research
    • Case Studies

    More

    • Annuvia's Blog
    • Where to Get CPR Training
    • Arch AED Management
    • Scholarship
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google +
    • YouTube
    • LinkedIn
      Copyright © 2025 Annuvia. All Rights Reserved.